According columbus board of realtors to him, can not speculate on how long troop movements actually

Fri, 5 Sep
Erusõjaväelane Urmas Rose Hill is confident that the Economist's Edward Lucas is a columnist in his article published in the argument seems to be able to occupy the Baltic countries in three hours, taken from the ceiling, and it's not real.
If even ordinary cars are being driven from Narva Hiiumaa, then a fortiori does not move as fast as the military. "Neither the Russian army did not fire it at a speed of 100 km per hour," columbus board of realtors said Rose Hill. "This is the time to exaggerate and far-fetched."
According columbus board of realtors to him, can not speculate on how long troop movements actually take the time, because a lot depends on how ready is the protector, the units are mobilized, the Defence Forces have been elevated to the ready state, the state of the allied troops. "If NATO really wants to help us, then those items must arrive here much earlier than the assault begins," said Rose Hill.
Rose Hill agreed completely with Lucas that is difficult to defend the Baltic states. "An attacker can use the tool to all - both on land, at sea and in the air, because we have a very long coastline," he explained. "And it is very difficult to defend."
Rose Hill argues that Russia would never separate attack on Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, but if an attack takes place, it will be targeted throughout the Baltics. He brought comparisons to one small room can not even put a hundred people in a fight, because there is not enough space.
"If military action is planned, then some units here and can not take into account the fact that a man struggling with a man," said Rose Hill, who said that the army is a tactical space for at least 300 yards.
Rose Hill also recalled that German Chancellor Angela Merkel said earlier this week in Latvia, the Baltic countries to NATO bases do not come. "It is debatable and depends on what we understand all the bases," columbus board of realtors said Rose Hill. "If NATO units in the classic sense, with the families and the corresponding infrastructure, then it will not fire. But NATO does not prohibit someone here to keep the unit, which is exchanged for two or three months."
"Military personnel themselves do not accept these decisions," said Rose Hill, who said Merkel was also behind the utterance of their national interest. "As the leader of each country faces its own national interests, as well as Merkel stands for the interests of Germany, and Germany does not want that relations with Russia would be sharp."
However, depends on the political will of the countries of the world are currently moments. "Our small country has always been pawns of big game country," said Rose Hill, which according to him can not be absolutely sure invocation of Article 5.
Laaneots: Merkel in Germany, and not the views of NATO (101) 19 August 2014 15:52
International: Ireland World Opinion Krimi Post Newsletters Archive Delfi TV Picture Delfi Estonia Weather columbus board of realtors Forecast Useful Life Sport Baltic Markets Voice of Young Audiences Forte woman's voice Teardrop Eesti Ekspress Eesti Päevaleht Maaleht travel guide Modern Home
Check your links added or consult an IT specialist.