Popular sovereignty | Key - lexical Journal of Political Thought
Concepts A rc h / University / intelligence / violence / violent mass / archive / personal security / home / old time / health / border / disgust / art gallery / digital image / index gods / Human Resources / Announcement / confession / life / exposure / treatment / TV / parasite / persistent trauma royale lepage / territory / money / angry / not funny / capture / State / migrant workers / military heritage / idea / Eastern / minor / traditional / place / safe space / Martyr / game / role playing / soul / frontier / Suffering / style / subject-citizen / subjectivity / employee Archive / with / the principle of economy / Horde / Fotomonolog / political / refugees / Photo / Aerial (historical source) / Aerial (Aerial decoding) / Aerial (Community) / photo horizontal / photo living / R sot speech / regulation / sovereignty / equality / political song / common sense / motion / translation /
The concept of "popular sovereignty" or "popular sovereignty" was a central concept of democratic struggles in the seventeenth century to the anti-colonial struggles of the twentieth century. Indeed, in these days of the early twentieth century and one similar royale lepage to it is no longer a significant concept in political discourse, but it still appears in the discourse of the populist movement growing in different places, such as in Western Europe and South America. Indeed, the concept is far from clear, and the complexity stems from the constant internal tension to which he has. On the one hand, the tension royale lepage between uniformity characterizes the sovereign power and the multiplicity inherent royale lepage in the concept. On the other hand, the tension associated with multiple meanings of the concept, which could point to the whole nation, for the plebs or ethno-cultural unit. 1 The first tension is rooted in the historical development royale lepage of the concept. The idea of a sovereign nation, the modern meaning, evolving from the concept of the sovereign king, and therefore carries a uniform and unifying meaning. In fact, as long as the late Middle Ages, the idea of the sovereign people was the source of legitimacy of the king's absolute power, and so by separating the legitimacy of political power (sovereign nation) and the identity royale lepage operator this powerful ruler (king). 2 The constant presence of the idea of sovereignty unified source - some of the king's body undergoes unity of the centralized state - leads to an unresolved tension that contain meanings associated with understanding the concept of "popular sovereignty" in the power of many. 3
The second factor to the complexity of the concept of the sovereign nation royale lepage has multiple meanings of the concept. First, as noted above, we can understand with several different meanings royale lepage that often are intertwined. First, the term "people" often symbolizes the entire nation. However, royale lepage as Bernard Yak (Yack) suggests, the two concepts are not identical, since the term "nation" suggests the image of a common historical heritage, which means that a nation is an imagined community over time, while the concept does not require a temporal dimension 4; Therefore, there is also the concept with a second meaning, and is a political community, polis, that has a common regional political framework; Third, royale lepage it is also ordinary citizens with the "lower classes, what the Romans called plebs. Finally, the concept of a pointer on a single ethno-cultural royale lepage one, meaning that matches royale lepage what the Germans called Volk. 5
This work is an attempt to deal with the complexity of the concept by a combined process of liquidation (deconstruction) and reconstruction (re-construction). 6 meaning of the first moment is to show the tensions between the various meanings inherent in the concept of "popular sovereignty." These meanings are not just theoretical field, and perhaps not even primarily in, but in the form of various political struggles. The second moment definition effort Habermas (Habermas), the term "reconstruction" (reconstruction) of the rebuilding process theory royale lepage - in this case the idea - to achieve its mission better. 7 The purpose of the attempt to rebuild the concept of sovereignty of the people is to preserve the critical royale lepage potential, and radical democratic idea of "popular sovereignty."
Giving up the idea of the sovereignty of the people have a waiver of the main promises of the democratic idea. Etymologically, democracy and popular sovereignty are synonymous. Meaning of democracy for the Athenians was the rule of the people - sovereignty. Development of democracy in its infancy, Mklaistns (Kleistenes) to Afielts (Ephialtes) is the development of the sovereign power of the people. 8 giving up the idea of the sovereign people of Maine one of its meanings centrality of the democratic idea: the idea of an autonomous political community, as controlling herself by herself. On the other hand, you can not get the concept at face value, because at the democratic potential inherent in it, is also dangerous totalitarian and exclusion of those who is considered to belong to the collective. On the one hand to escape the anti-democratic implications of giving up the idea of the sovereignty of the people, on the other hand uncritical acceptance of the concept, we must try to elucidate the complexity; Chapter
Concepts A rc h / University / intelligence / violence / violent mass / archive / personal security / home / old time / health / border / disgust / art gallery / digital image / index gods / Human Resources / Announcement / confession / life / exposure / treatment / TV / parasite / persistent trauma royale lepage / territory / money / angry / not funny / capture / State / migrant workers / military heritage / idea / Eastern / minor / traditional / place / safe space / Martyr / game / role playing / soul / frontier / Suffering / style / subject-citizen / subjectivity / employee Archive / with / the principle of economy / Horde / Fotomonolog / political / refugees / Photo / Aerial (historical source) / Aerial (Aerial decoding) / Aerial (Community) / photo horizontal / photo living / R sot speech / regulation / sovereignty / equality / political song / common sense / motion / translation /
The concept of "popular sovereignty" or "popular sovereignty" was a central concept of democratic struggles in the seventeenth century to the anti-colonial struggles of the twentieth century. Indeed, in these days of the early twentieth century and one similar royale lepage to it is no longer a significant concept in political discourse, but it still appears in the discourse of the populist movement growing in different places, such as in Western Europe and South America. Indeed, the concept is far from clear, and the complexity stems from the constant internal tension to which he has. On the one hand, the tension royale lepage between uniformity characterizes the sovereign power and the multiplicity inherent royale lepage in the concept. On the other hand, the tension associated with multiple meanings of the concept, which could point to the whole nation, for the plebs or ethno-cultural unit. 1 The first tension is rooted in the historical development royale lepage of the concept. The idea of a sovereign nation, the modern meaning, evolving from the concept of the sovereign king, and therefore carries a uniform and unifying meaning. In fact, as long as the late Middle Ages, the idea of the sovereign people was the source of legitimacy of the king's absolute power, and so by separating the legitimacy of political power (sovereign nation) and the identity royale lepage operator this powerful ruler (king). 2 The constant presence of the idea of sovereignty unified source - some of the king's body undergoes unity of the centralized state - leads to an unresolved tension that contain meanings associated with understanding the concept of "popular sovereignty" in the power of many. 3
The second factor to the complexity of the concept of the sovereign nation royale lepage has multiple meanings of the concept. First, as noted above, we can understand with several different meanings royale lepage that often are intertwined. First, the term "people" often symbolizes the entire nation. However, royale lepage as Bernard Yak (Yack) suggests, the two concepts are not identical, since the term "nation" suggests the image of a common historical heritage, which means that a nation is an imagined community over time, while the concept does not require a temporal dimension 4; Therefore, there is also the concept with a second meaning, and is a political community, polis, that has a common regional political framework; Third, royale lepage it is also ordinary citizens with the "lower classes, what the Romans called plebs. Finally, the concept of a pointer on a single ethno-cultural royale lepage one, meaning that matches royale lepage what the Germans called Volk. 5
This work is an attempt to deal with the complexity of the concept by a combined process of liquidation (deconstruction) and reconstruction (re-construction). 6 meaning of the first moment is to show the tensions between the various meanings inherent in the concept of "popular sovereignty." These meanings are not just theoretical field, and perhaps not even primarily in, but in the form of various political struggles. The second moment definition effort Habermas (Habermas), the term "reconstruction" (reconstruction) of the rebuilding process theory royale lepage - in this case the idea - to achieve its mission better. 7 The purpose of the attempt to rebuild the concept of sovereignty of the people is to preserve the critical royale lepage potential, and radical democratic idea of "popular sovereignty."
Giving up the idea of the sovereignty of the people have a waiver of the main promises of the democratic idea. Etymologically, democracy and popular sovereignty are synonymous. Meaning of democracy for the Athenians was the rule of the people - sovereignty. Development of democracy in its infancy, Mklaistns (Kleistenes) to Afielts (Ephialtes) is the development of the sovereign power of the people. 8 giving up the idea of the sovereign people of Maine one of its meanings centrality of the democratic idea: the idea of an autonomous political community, as controlling herself by herself. On the other hand, you can not get the concept at face value, because at the democratic potential inherent in it, is also dangerous totalitarian and exclusion of those who is considered to belong to the collective. On the one hand to escape the anti-democratic implications of giving up the idea of the sovereignty of the people, on the other hand uncritical acceptance of the concept, we must try to elucidate the complexity; Chapter
No comments:
Post a Comment